Sunday, November 29, 2009

100 Great Moments in American History

YouTube has some incredible video clips from history. The History is Elementary blog alerted readers to a fabulous site where 100 great moments in American History are on YouTube video clips.

I am working with Information Services to allow YouTube to be in our schools. However, you might look at the videos - you can download them into your computer and then play them to your class.
Click to go to the 100 Great Moments in American History.




Thursday, November 26, 2009

George Washington's 1789 Thanksgiving Proclamation

Perhaps a meaningful piece of history still applicable in its sentiments today....


George Washington's 1789 Thanksgiving Proclamation


Whereas it is the duty of all nations to acknowledge the providence of Almighty God, to obey His will, to be grateful for His benefits, and humbly to implore His protection and favor; and Whereas both Houses of Congress have, by their joint committee, requested me to "recommend to the people of the United States a day of public thanksgiving and prayer, to be observed by acknowledging with grateful hearts the many and signal favors of Almighty God, especially by affording them an opportunity peaceably to establish a form of government for their safety and happiness:"



Now, therefore, I do recommend and assign Thursday, the 26th day of November next, to be devoted by the people of these States to the service of that great and glorious Being who is the beneficent author of all the good that was, that is, or that will be; that we may then all unite in rendering unto Him our sincere and humble thanks for His kind care and protection of the people of this country previous to their becoming a nation; for the signal and manifold mercies and the favorable interpositions of His providence in the course and conclusion of the late war; for the great degree of tranquility, union, and plenty which we have since enjoyed; for the peaceable and rational manner in which we have been enable to establish constitutions of government for our safety and happiness, and particularly the national one now lately instituted for the civil and religious liberty with which we are blessed, and the means we have of acquiring and diffusing useful knowledge; and, in general, for all the great and various favors which He has been pleased to confer upon us.



And also that we may then unite in most humbly offering our prayers and supplications to the great Lord and Ruler of Nations and beseech Him to pardon our national and other transgressions; to enable us all, whether in public or private stations, to perform our several and relative duties properly and punctually; to render our National Government a blessing to all the people by constantly being a Government of wise, just, and constitutional laws, discreetly and faithfully executed and obeyed; to protect and guide all sovereigns and nations (especially such as have shown kindness to us), and to bless them with good governments, peace, and concord; to promote the knowledge and practice of true religion and virtue, and the increase of science among them and us; and, generally to grant unto all mankind such a degree of temporal prosperity as He alone knows to be best.



Given under my hand, at the city of New York, the 3d day of October, A.D. 1789.

Saturday, November 21, 2009

Mussolini + Brain + EBay


Glad to see that there is a continued interest in history.... (he says with tongue in cheek)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8371171.stm

Or, for those interested, Galileo's lost body parts returned to 'responsible' hands....

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8371521.stm

Thursday, September 3, 2009

“Separation of Church and State”, Part I

I’ve been reading Original Intent, The Courts, The Constitution, & Religion, by David Barton. It is interesting reading.

Since this is Constitution Month (and September 17 is Constitution Day, followed by Freedom Week), I thought I’d share one aspect of the Constitution and Bill of Rights from the book.

The First Amendment states: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…”

According to Barton,

“The current application of the “separation of church and state” metaphor actually represents a relatively recent concept rather than the enforcement of a long-standing constitutional principal. This is demonstrated by the fact that the separation idiom appeared in only two cases in the Supreme Court’s first 150 years; yet over the past 50 years, it has been cited in seemingly countless numbers of Court decisions.”
Many of our citizens think that the phrase “separation of church and state” appears in the Constitution.

It does not.

The 1947 Supreme Court 5-4 decision in Everson v. Board of Education established the contemporary standard for this phrase. In that decision the court announced:

“The First Amendment has erected a wall between church and state. That wall must be kept high and impregnable. We could not approve the slightest breach.”

After this declaration, the Supreme Court, as well as many lower courts, began striking down religious activities and expressions which had been constitutional for the previous 150 years.

The phrase “separation of church and state” actually first appeared in an exchange of letters between President Thomas Jefferson and the Baptist Association of Danbury, Connecticut.

Jefferson was the first Anti-Federalist President, who was also a champion of the rights of minority religions (in this case Baptists) in Virginia, and an advocate of clear limits on the centralization of government powers.

The Danbury Baptists wrote to Jefferson on October 7, 1801 – nearly seven months after his first inauguration as President. In their letter of congratulations to the new President, the Danbury Baptists also expressed their concern over the entire concept of the First Amendment. They wrote:

“Our sentiments are uniformly on the side of religious liberty: that religion is at all times and places a matter between God and individuals, that no man ought to suffer in name, person, or effects on account of his religious opinions, that the legitimate power of civil government extends no further than to punish the man who works ill to his neighbor. But sir, our constitution of government is not specific…. Therefore what religious privileges we enjoy (as a minor part of the State) we enjoy as favors granted, and not as inalienable rights.”
Jefferson wrote a short reply to the Danbury Baptists on January 1, 1802, in which he assured them that the free exercise of religion would not be interfered with by the national government. He wrote:

“Gentlemen, - the affectionate sentiments of esteem and approbation which you are so good as to express towards me on behalf of the Danbury Baptist Association give me the highest satisfaction. Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God; that he owes account to no other for his faith or his worship; that the legislative powers of government reach actions only and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should “make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,” thus building a wall of separation between Church and State. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties. I reciprocate your kind prayers for the protection and blessing of the common Father and Creator of man, and tender you for yourselves and your religious associations assurances of my high respect and esteem.”
Jefferson believed that religious liberties were inalienable rights and that the issue of religious expression was above federal jurisdiction.

Basically, it turns out that the Supreme Court in the Everson case rested its decision not on the Constitution, but on an interpretation of a letter to a Baptist organization by a President – who was reaffirming religious liberties. The Supreme Court went on to continually use this phrase in its decisions since the landmark 1947 case. Part II of this blog entry will explore some of those decisions.

PHOTO SOURCES:

The US Supreme Court building
The Bill of Rights

-

Thursday, August 27, 2009

Quiz Answers

Here are the quiz answers to Monday's questions. How did you do?

THE ANSWERS:

1851 Peru
1776 Scotland
1829 Mexico
1863 The Netherlands
1865 The United States
1861 Russia
1876 The Ottoman Empire
1848 Denmark
1962 Saudi Arabia1837 Spain

Sunday, August 23, 2009

August 23: Ending Official Slavery

On August 23, 1833, Great Britain became the first of Europe’s great empires to abolish slavery in all of its colonies. While not the first to abolish slavery, Britain was the most politically powerful nation to do so up to that time. This was the beginning action that would result in the abolishing of slavery by various countries around the world.

See how well you do…. Can you match the following nations with the year listed below in which they officially abolished slavery?

Peru
Scotland
Mexico
The Netherlands
The United States
Russia
The Ottoman Empire
Denmark
Saudi Arabia
Spain

The Years:
1776
1829
1837
1848
1851
1861
1863
1865
1876
1962

The answers will be posted on this blog on Thursday, August 27.

Monday, August 17, 2009

Teaching American History Grant


The nearest 'big city' television station broadcast a blurb on Citrus County receiving the Teaching American History grant.

To view the video, go to http://www.baynews9.com/VideoPlayer/?Citrus_School_Grants_816

Our district will be working hard to identify the participants and to get the program rolling.

It's an exciting time. A special thanks to Mr. Klauder for the picture.