THE MEETING AT ANNAPOLIS

With Washington's birthday rapidly approaching, I'd like to share some century old textbook strategies that I'm not sure we should abandon. Source: an old American textbook I own titled The Greater Republic, 1899. Look at the use of quotations to reinforce the topic. The textbook also has extensive use of stories to get a lesson across - and research does indicate that students remember data wrapped in stories better than just data. I know that I found the short section from the textbook that follows to be revealing....

THE MEETING AT ANNAPOLIS

Shay’s rebellion was one of the best things that could have happened, for it showed the country more clearly than before that it was on the verge of anarchy, and that the remedy must not be delayed. Long before this, Washington comprehended the serious peril of the country, and he was in continual consultation with men whose worth and counsel he valued. The result was that a meeting of commissioners from Maryland, Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York met at Annapolis in September 1786. They held an earnest discussion, but as only a minority of the States were represented, nothing positive could be done, and an adjournment was had with a recommendation that each State should send delegates to meet in Philadelphia in May, 1787. The prestige of Washington’s name gave so much weight to the recommendation that at the appointed date all the States were represented except Rhode Island.

The wisdom of Washington was again manifest in a letter which he wrote some months before the meeting of the Constitutional Convention, and which contained the following:

“We have errors to correct. We have probably had too good an opinion of human nature in forming our confederation. Experience has taught us that without the intervention of a coercive power, men will not adopt and carry into execution measures best calculated for their own good. I do not conceive we can exist long as a nation without having lodged somewhere a power that will pervade the whole Union in as energetic a manner as the authority of the State governments extend over the several States…. I am told that even respectable characters speak of a monarchical form of government without horror. From thinking proceeds speaking; thence acting is but a single step. But how irrevocable and tremendous! What a triumph for our enemies to verify their predictions! What a triumph for the advocates of despotism to find that we are incapable of governing ourselves, and that systems founded on the basis of equal liberty are merely ideal and fallacious!”

When the news reached Washington of the disorders in New England, he was greatly troubled. “What stronger evidence can be given,” he asked, ‘of the want of energy in our government than these disorders? If there is not a power in it to check them, what security has a man for his life, liberty, or property? The consequences of a bad or inefficient government are too obvious to be dwelt upon. Thirteen sovereigns pulling against one another, and all tugging at the federal head, will soon bring ruin on the whole; whereas, a liberal and energetic constitution, well checked and well watched to prevent encroachment might restore us to that degree of respectability and consequence to which we had the fairest prospect of attaining.”

Essential Question: Is the use of quoted statements valuable in encouraging students to gain understanding of the concept being studied.